Re: OT: rude behaviour
"cat K." <[email protected]> Sat, 15 Nov 2025 10:46:40 +1030
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gopher.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
glad you asked!=20 phetch (CLI) https://github.com/xvxx/phetch this client will render it as I intended without fail. VF-1 (CLI) https://sr.ht/~solderpunk/VF-1/ this client will render it as I intended without fail. cgo (CLI) https://github.com/kieselsteini/cgo will render it almost perfectly, one minor glitch. Lagrange (GUI) https://gmi.skyjake.fi/lagrange/ ostensibly a Gemini protocol browser but it handles Gopher sites pretty = well, including mine mostly successfully. there's probably more out there but why am I doing the legwork for you? = you are the Gopher users, this is the Gopher list, I only subscribed a = couple days ago. if you didn't know any of this what were you using = Gopher for aside from kicking the tires to confirm that yes indeed your = server is still up even if no one remembers why. regards =E2=96=88=E2=96=84=E2=96=80=E2=96=84=E2=96=80 cat K. =E2=96=88=E2=96=80=E2=96=84=E2=96=80=E2=96=84 B 4 U D W 3 R K 5 _ =E2=96=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80 +1 (929) 601-BAUD > On 15 Nov 2025, at 10:11=E2=80=AFAM, Sean Conner <sean-/[email protected]> = wrote: >=20 > It was thus said that the Great cat K. once stated: >>=20 >> I wouldn't expect a DEC vt510 from 1993 to render my Gopher hole as I >> intended in 2025 any more than I would expect Mosaic to properly = render >> YouTube. >=20 > Do you expect any modern Gopher client to properly render your page? = The > gopher browser I use (which I wrote) strips out ANSI escape codes as I > consider them a security threat [1]. I still see the art, but it's not = as > colorful. It was also easier to strip them out than to attempt to = support > ANSI escape codes [2]. >=20 > -spc >=20 > [1] There are defined escape sequences to issue application and > operating system level commands. There are also escape sequences > (in the "privately defined" areas) that can load the cut buffers > that could be problematic. Not all terminals or terminal emulators > support such sequences, but some. And at the very least, malicious > pages could set the terminal into a useless state (say, setting the > foreground and background colors the same). >=20 > [2] Technically, ECMA-48 (a European standard) as ANSI withdrew their > version in favor of ECMA-48. >=20