Re: OT: rude behaviour

again your assumptions sound like projection, nothing makes me happier =
than coming into a CompSci fossil's back yard and shaking their wires to =
see if there's any life in them. doubly happy if mine name and message =
is committed to the communal memory.

I think, as you and some others have suggested should be the ones to =
unsubscribe and, as the young Zoomers say; touch grass.

before the nurse comes over and wonders what all the ruckus around the =
communal computer is about.


regards

=E2=96=88=E2=96=84=E2=96=80=E2=96=84=E2=96=80  cat K.
=E2=96=88=E2=96=80=E2=96=84=E2=96=80=E2=96=84  B 4 U D W 3 R K 5 _
=E2=96=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80  +1 (929) 601-BAUD

> On 15 Nov 2025, at 10:25=E2=80=AFAM, Nuno Silva =
<[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> On 2025-11-14, cat K. wrote:
>>> On 15 Nov 2025, at 3:54=E2=80=AFAM, Brian Koontz
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Cat, you can always start your own gopher discussion on discord or
>>> wherever you think traction can be gained. I don=E2=80=99t think =
anyone here
>>> would oppose that.
>>>=20
>>> But in the end, just about every esoteric mailing list I subscribe
>>> to (gopher, pdp-11, packet radio, diy efi, vintage jaguar, etc.) is
>>> catacomb-silent, with occasional bursts of static. I don=E2=80=99t =
think
>>> it=E2=80=99s a gopher problem. Most of the world doesn=E2=80=99t =
share our
>>> enthusiasm for eclectic topics like gopher. And tbh I sort of like
>>> it that way.
>>=20
>> what possible reason would I have to want to start my own discussion
>> elsewhere when this list, again ostensibly THE list, is finally
>> talking about Gopher?
>=20
> You were visibly not happy about how this list was working, and you =
did
> speak of other media, so one could think you might prefer such a venue
> for conversation.
>=20
> --=20
> Nuno Silva
>=20