Re: IPv6 reverse lookup by Windows

Jeroen Massar <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.ipv6.general
Organization Unfix
Message-ID <[email protected]>
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:

> We are considering four possible implementations:
> 1. try only ip6.arpa

This is the only one that should exist in current and new implementations.

For deployed stacks, the ones people don't want/forget to upgrade there
is a very simple solution to all of this: DNAME

8<--------------------------------------------------------------
jeroen@purgatory:~$ dig @ns2.sixxs.net 8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.int. any

; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> @ns2.sixxs.net 8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.int. any
; (2 servers found)
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 35661
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.int.       IN      ANY

;; ANSWER SECTION:
ip6.int.                604800  IN      DNAME   ip6.arpa.
8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.int. 0      IN      CNAME   8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa.
------------------------------------------------------------>8

For SixXS we implemented the above on 9-9-2004 and we have, till date,
not received a single report of problems in doing this. Except for
people trying to put their reverse under ip6.int and not under ip6.arpa,
but those where easily fixed.

RIR's and other 'high level' DNS servers could thus easily DNAME ip6.int
to ip6.arpa, moving current ip6.int NS delegations to ip6.arpa, if there
is no delegating there and notifying the admins that this was done.
Note for resolvers not supporting DNAME a CNAME is emitted and resolvers
do support this. Also most resolvers will understand DNAME when they are
from a timeframe where the host is also IPv6 capable.

Greets,
 Jeroen
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 238 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Jeroen Massar / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/

iD8DBQFDogMYKaooUjM+fCMRAsO5AJ4tBiN/uffNYscKVHEvx/oIi2s5EACfTIeN
f0da3V90oBOopEwfyL0VNnQ=
=sS1K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.