Re: CFD, EB members and admin votes

Andy Smith <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.irc.blitzed.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 09:32:06PM +0100, Ben Ullmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I think the thing to consider is why does Blitzed give admins a vote in the
> first place. Why do they get a vote and not opers or other members of staff.
> Presumably the thinking behind it is that they are providing the base
> function of the network in servers and without servers there can be no
> network. They have gone to the trouble of getting a server and applying to
> link and then maintaining the server. It is this which is recognised and why
> they are given the vote. All the EB members who have servers have had to go
> through the same process and so it seems only right to give them the same
> votes as any other admin.

What made you change your mind?  When you were an EB member, you
opposed EB having votes. :)

> There is also something in the argument that EB members
> should ONLY ever be admins of servers because they have a direct vested and
> perhaps economic interest in the network. Would it be right for someone who
> had none of these ties to be a member of the EB?

I think it would depend on the person.  For example, I hope that I
am still considered worthy of being in the EB, but if I could run
lik-m-aid anymore than I wouldn't be an IRC admin.

I also think that soon it will be time when we should look into ways
of electing and removing EB members, but that will need a lot of
though, particularly on who exactly is allowed to do the voting.
That is a very much separate conversation..

-- 
http://freebsdwiki.org/ - Encrypted mail welcome - keyid 0xBF15490B

"I remember the first time I made love.  Perhaps it was not love exactly but I
 made it and it still works."
 -- The League Against Tedium

_______________________________________________
public mailing list
public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected]
http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFA+bYbIJm2TL8VSQsRAokUAKCNoiEPisb3uCl85tQHD5DsHDv6bgCcDAuR
xUm//s5chrMmvs5AnroZiSk=
=pAGM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.