Re: hostmangling in new ircd
Tim Hicks <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:50:23 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.blitzed.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
What austnet.org <http://austnet.org> does: * [synfx] (radiostar-8hQ7Dm9bB4B4LZUTKYkyYnZjjERCKxA67bdBIQen8uI@public.gmane.org): Tim * [synfx] on Virtual World as vw-28580.iinet.net.au<http://vw-28580.iinet.net.au> And anyone whose hostname doesn't resolve gets a garbage IP, eg. 203.206.61.28580. On 8/23/05, Andy Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:39:13AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > > If you have a spare moment could you log in to one of our testnet > > servers, e.g. strugglers.net <http://strugglers.net> port 7500 and try > and break[1] or > > otherwise defeat[2] the hostmangling that Mark R has put in?: > > > > 10:34 -!- grifferz [~andy-zUHCcq+i6BtDM3tNdDN3uDDEoF5KDggSZ+GEbx8BII3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org<http://Blitzed-0xb8e84e39.blitzed.eu.org> > ] > > Ryan pointed out that Blitzed-0xb8e84e39.blitzed.eu.org<http://Blitzed-0xb8e84e39.blitzed.eu.org>could > possibly be a real existing host, and also that if I were to connect > as e.g. foo-rcD4agzmKD/[email protected] then my mangled host is going to be > something like [email protected] which could be registered > by anyone. > > Can anyone think of a way we could make the hosts into invalid ones? > Just putting blitzed at the end would do it but then we'd end up > with hosts like: > > Blitzed-0xb8e84e39.blitzed.eu.org.blitzed > > which when banned by many scripts/clients would give a ban like > *.blitzed.eu.org.blitzed - doesn't get banned when user is set -q > again. > > We could change the "-" into an underscore: > > foo@Blitzed_0x12345678.net > > That isn't a valid domain. Still has problems: > > - Although "_" isn't valid in internet hostnames, some broken DNS > servers do allow it and as a result there are real hosts on the > internet with "_" in them. > > - Since "_" is technically not valid there may be scripts and > clients that will not accept that in hostnames. > > What do other networks with masking/mangling do? As far as I can > see the only way to make completely invalid hosts is to add your own > TLD on the end. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFDCv37IJm2TL8VSQsRAl84AJ9LkAadNVU9OguhSJJEKwOQFZ74SwCgqruC > w1YMlzRnEfLsDVIiESGfj4o= > =N1V5 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > public mailing list > public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected] > http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public > > > _______________________________________________ public mailing list public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected] http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public