Re: hostmangling in new ircd
Andy Smith <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:00:38 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.blitzed.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Another thing that was mentioned on the unrealircd forum [1] is that
for a two part host such as example.com it gets cloaked to something
like blitzed-1a7b4df9.com, which totally removes any indication of what
"ISP" it is, supposedly one of the design goals of cloaking in
unreal [2].
Is this acceptable?
If not, we could mangle it anyway but add the fake bit on the start
and hope no one guesses (blitzed-1a7b4df9.example.com).
Or we could decide not to mangle it at all and tell people to pick
longer hosts if they want them mangled. :)
Thoughts?
[1] http://forums.unrealircd.com/viewtopic.php?t=2386&sid=b55ac43c177bfe5cdd2786f6dfe262bc
[2] If so, why do cloaked IPs lose all resemblance to an IP address?
You can't work out what organisation a cloaked IP belongs to.
_______________________________________________
public mailing list
public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected]
http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDDKe2IJm2TL8VSQsRAv1lAKDp5p9dOE0z0gHZjtMW0ICvfnJeDgCg/qMv mcdlOvtx2VOPkIln0tsdEvw= =LWDL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----