Re: Leak in BOPM

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 22 August 2004 3:13 pm, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 12:02:28PM -0700, Erik Fears wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > 	I'm running a central BOPM on a medium sized network (approx
> > > 1000 users), and it is appear to be leaking memory (i've seen it
> > > running at a couple hundred MB). My current workaround is to
> > > /kill it every 60 minutes, but that's hardly a fix.
> > >
> > > 	I do run multiple DNSBLs (cbl.abuseat njabl, and opm.blitzed),
> > > and there's just one BOPM for the entire network (unreal3.2.1
> > > with NICKIP, listening for far-connects). Any other information
> > > required, I will provide as soon as I can procure it.
> >
> > Are you sure this is a leak and not the scan queue filling up.
> > There is no max limit on the scan queue, so if your scanner can't
> > keep up then it will quickly fill up your memory.
>
> Yes, tabris, please let us know these stats:
>
12:55:19 <+WCProxyBot> Uptime: 2 days, 23:42:32
12:55:19 <+WCProxyBot> DNSBL: 96 successful lookups from opm.blitzed.org
12:55:19 <+WCProxyBot> DNSBL: 4 reports sent
12:55:19 <+WCProxyBot> Found 1 (HTTP) open.
12:55:19 <+WCProxyBot> Found 3 (HTTPPOST) open.
12:55:19 <+WCProxyBot> Number of connects: 169902 (39.49/minute)
and the RSS is sitting at 21MB (none in swap). i haven't seen it go up 
for about a day... but that's still pretty big and one wonders why it 
doesn't free() any of the memory for the scan queue...

- --
tabris
- -
Probable-Possible, my black hen,
She lays eggs in the Relative When.
She doesn't lay eggs in the Positive Now
Because she's unable to postulate How.
		-- Frederick Winsor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBLhZ71U5ZaPMbKQcRAuV1AJ9DqqHz6UPo1xEoWrOBMpmTinNShACfeBKa
0PVpGkcwh8lho9J9ZynSbAg=
=Sjmr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----