bopm problem
Alex McMillen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.bopm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I don't mean to act like a n00b, however this is a huge problem, today, I had a botnet attempting to load about 500 total proxies, 300 of which were caught by bopm and k:lined, however the other 200 were not caught and I had to manually ban them. I'm using 3 dnsbls, and it's configured "perfectly" but why isn't bopm scanning even some of the simplest proxy ports used today to bypass scans? Shouldn't more ports be added to bopm's list of ports to scan? Alex