Re: BOPM CTCP VERSION Patch

The forgotten link: http://unborn.ludost.net/bopmserv/


--- ongeboren <[email protected]> wrote:

> Alternatively you may try the bopm server emulator I
> did for my irc network. This way you may use a
> single
> bopm bot to scan the whole network and apply
> whatever
> patches you want to this single bot.
> And yes, if your network is too big, like mine is,
> you
> may spread the load between multiple bopm bots
> running
> on multiple mashines.
> 
> 
> 
> --- nv <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hello, Thanks for the reply...
> > I have tried all the Options but none of them
> seems
> > to work with the 
> > IRCd (Austhex) At the moment, I have 2 Options, I
> > could code a bot in 
> > perl, Which I am thinking of doing...Or Set the
> BOPM
> > to do it. That is 
> > the main reason I was interested in the BOPM's
> > Patch. Because, The 
> > BOPM's work fine and If we could let it scan for
> > CTCP Versions, it will 
> > cut down a lot of work and Time rather than
> > Deploying a Bot on every 
> > server... The IRCd doesn't support remote traffic
> > monitor for Opers So, 
> > a bot has to be placed on every single
> > server...which is kinda pain on 
> > the neck...
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > tabris wrote:
> > 
> > >On Saturday 05 March 2005 10:28 am, nv wrote:
> > >  
> > >
> > >>Hello,
> > >>I have been going through the BOPM Mailing list
> > and found out there
> > >>is a CTCP Version Patch which CTCP the clients
> > when connect and
> > >>match/kline them. I couldn't find the patch
> > anywhere...Any Idea where
> > >>I can find it?
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >	I'd think you'd be better off just having
> > something like NeoStats 
> > >SecureServ. or Unreal's SpamFilter (you still
> have
> > to send a CTCP 
> > >request).
> > >
> > >	Or just code your own regexp bot in Perl. a
> > socketbot coded in perl 
> > >isn't too hard to do really. and it'll be a)
> easier
> > to test b) easier 
> > >to code.
> > >
> > >	I have a feeling that this kind of thing might
> > qualify as freeping 
> > >creaturism. When I go on a service call I don't
> > normally bring a 
> > >combination
> > blowtorch/screwdriver/knife/pliers/coping-saw.
> > >Just the screwdriver and pliers will be fine, and
> > if I need the 
> > >blowtorch I'll get it from my vehicle ;).
> > >
> > >	Simplicity is the UNIX way. Maybe what we need
> (I
> > have a 
> > >developer/friend who would agree even) is an
> > extensible framework, like 
> > >NeoStats (tho I'd prefer something better), that
> > you can insert various 
> > >kinds of modules into.
> > >
> > >	Thus you have both simplicity (modular) while
> not
> > 20 separate bots 
> > >either, as some ppl seem to want.
> > >
> > >	I'd suggest SurrealServices core-code but it's
> in
> > perl which not 
> > >everyone would appreciate. Hopefully we'll have
> > time to make a C 
> > >version, later.
> > >
> > >	If anyone DOES want to see SurrealServices, I'll
> > reply with a link.
> > >  
> > >
> >
>
>>http://lists.blitzed.org/pipermail/bopm/2003-February/000976.html
> >
>
>>http://lists.blitzed.org/pipermail/bopm/2003-February/000975.html
> > >>
> > >>Thanks
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> 		
> __________________________________ 
> Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
> Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web 
> http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com