Re: BOPM CTCP VERSION Patch

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
None of them likes the IRCd, So I am going to have to code a bot /
Eggdrop to do it for me. I was hoping BOPM could but I guess the patch
is not around. Thanks guys... I will keep you updated :)

ongeboren wrote:

|The forgotten link: http://unborn.ludost.net/bopmserv/
|
|
|--- ongeboren <[email protected]> wrote:
|
|>Alternatively you may try the bopm server emulator I
|>did for my irc network. This way you may use a
|>single
|>bopm bot to scan the whole network and apply
|>whatever
|>patches you want to this single bot.
|>And yes, if your network is too big, like mine is,
|>you
|>may spread the load between multiple bopm bots
|>running
|>on multiple mashines.
|>
|>
|>
|>--- nv <[email protected]> wrote:
|>
|>>Hello, Thanks for the reply...
|>>I have tried all the Options but none of them
|>
|>seems
|>
|>>to work with the
|>>IRCd (Austhex) At the moment, I have 2 Options, I
|>>could code a bot in
|>>perl, Which I am thinking of doing...Or Set the
|>
|>BOPM
|>
|>>to do it. That is
|>>the main reason I was interested in the BOPM's
|>>Patch. Because, The
|>>BOPM's work fine and If we could let it scan for
|>>CTCP Versions, it will
|>>cut down a lot of work and Time rather than
|>>Deploying a Bot on every
|>>server... The IRCd doesn't support remote traffic
|>>monitor for Opers So,
|>>a bot has to be placed on every single
|>>server...which is kinda pain on
|>>the neck...
|>>
|>>Thanks
|>>
|>>tabris wrote:
|>>
|>>>On Saturday 05 March 2005 10:28 am, nv wrote:
|>>>
|>>>
|>>>>Hello,
|>>>>I have been going through the BOPM Mailing list
|>>
|>>and found out there
|>>
|>>>>is a CTCP Version Patch which CTCP the clients
|>>
|>>when connect and
|>>
|>>>>match/kline them. I couldn't find the patch
|>>
|>>anywhere...Any Idea where
|>>
|>>>>I can find it?
|>>>>   
|>>>>
|>>>    I'd think you'd be better off just having
|>>
|>>something like NeoStats
|>>
|>>>SecureServ. or Unreal's SpamFilter (you still
|>
|>have
|>
|>>to send a CTCP
|>>
|>>>request).
|>>>
|>>>    Or just code your own regexp bot in Perl. a
|>>
|>>socketbot coded in perl
|>>
|>>>isn't too hard to do really. and it'll be a)
|>
|>easier
|>
|>>to test b) easier
|>>
|>>>to code.
|>>>
|>>>    I have a feeling that this kind of thing might
|>>
|>>qualify as freeping
|>>
|>>>creaturism. When I go on a service call I don't
|>>
|>>normally bring a
|>>
|>>>combination
|>>
|>>blowtorch/screwdriver/knife/pliers/coping-saw.
|>>
|>>>Just the screwdriver and pliers will be fine, and
|>>
|>>if I need the
|>>
|>>>blowtorch I'll get it from my vehicle ;).
|>>>
|>>>    Simplicity is the UNIX way. Maybe what we need
|>
|>(I
|>
|>>have a
|>>
|>>>developer/friend who would agree even) is an
|>>
|>>extensible framework, like
|>>
|>>>NeoStats (tho I'd prefer something better), that
|>>
|>>you can insert various
|>>
|>>>kinds of modules into.
|>>>
|>>>    Thus you have both simplicity (modular) while
|>
|>not
|>
|>>20 separate bots
|>>
|>>>either, as some ppl seem to want.
|>>>
|>>>    I'd suggest SurrealServices core-code but it's
|>
|>in
|>
|>>perl which not
|>>
|>>>everyone would appreciate. Hopefully we'll have
|>>
|>>time to make a C
|>>
|>>>version, later.
|>>>
|>>>    If anyone DOES want to see SurrealServices, I'll
|>>
|>>reply with a link.
|>>
|>>>
|>>>
|>>http://lists.blitzed.org/pipermail/bopm/2003-February/000976.html
|>>
|>>http://lists.blitzed.org/pipermail/bopm/2003-February/000975.html
|>>
|>>>>Thanks
|>>>>   
|>>>>
|>>>
|>>>
|>
|>
|>    
|>        
|>__________________________________
|>Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
|>Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
|>http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
|>
|
|
|__________________________________________________
|Do You Yahoo!?
|Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
|http://mail.yahoo.com
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
 
iD8DBQFCL31PX4powL72gaIRAip+AKC4C0o0jj8h6XggvaVqqbu5pqeKBgCg6hMV
+OSDSbl4bwecw0OltrGOypk=
=G2W9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----