Re: Improving the WHOIS format
Charles Howard <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:25:17 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.irssi.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALOpf_sA3HY5abHotV8VcRa7vK-xHjDZQtWJ5dEKP=1f7WoZNA@mail.gmail.com> |
You obviously have a lot things you'd like to see changed so why not write your own IRC program since you seem to know how everything should be? On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Dwayne Henderson < [email protected]> wrote: > Look, all I'm saying is change the likes of "ircname" to "IRC name". > > Basically you're arguing that all development on Irssi should cease > because people are happy with the way things were. > > You don't like my ideas, fine. You wanna live in the past, fine. I just > hope you don't drag this project down with you. > > --Dwayne > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Jase Thew <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 12/01/2012 13:55, Dwayne Henderson wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Jase Thew <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Have you thought about all the people that are quite happy with this >>> formatting? Why should they have to change their themes due to a >>> change to just to suit your tastes? >>> >>> The entire point of theming is that if you don't like the default, >>> you are free to change it locally to something you do like. >>> >>> Jase. >>> >>> They don't have to change a thing. What I meant was fixing it from the >>> source. It ain't about personal taste, just a desire to fix what's >>> incomplete and incorrect. >>> >>> --Dwayne >>> >> >> I undertsand what you're suggesting, but it appears you may have >> misinterpreted the point I was raising : >> >> > Have you thought about all the people that are quite happy with > >> this formatting? Why should they have to change their themes due > >> to a change to just to suit your tastes? >> >> I was referring to people being happy with the *existing* formatting and >> how they would need to change their themes to keep that formatting should >> we change the default values as you propose. >> >> Irssi has default values for all of its formats stored internally (as a >> result of being defined in the source), so it will only save (to a theme >> file) formats that have had their value set (which I will call a custom >> value) in the current session (either manually via /format or by loading a >> theme file). The exception to this is when /save -formats is used instead >> of just /save. This causes *all* formats and their values to be written out >> to the theme file, not just the formats that have non-default values. >> Furthermore, if a custom value is not present Irssi will use its default >> value for that format when printformat'ing. >> >> So let's take the example of the whois formats you propose to change and >> let's assume there are a group of people who are happy with the existing >> default values for these formats. These people will not have any references >> to these formats in their theme file, so Irssi renders the whois output >> using its default values for these formats. >> >> Now suppose we change the default value for these formats as you propose >> - this would affect everyone who doesn't have a custom value for these >> formats. With the aforementioned people, if they wanted to keep the whois >> formatting they were already happy with, they would need to configure >> custom values in their theme file. >> >> So yes, changing the default value of formats will impact those people >> who have not overridden them and will affect those who are happy with the >> existing default values. Forcing such a change makes sense when a format's >> value is clearly incomplete or erroneous and needs to be corrected, but >> none whatsoever when the change is unnecessarily cosmetic at best. >> >> Jase. >> >> >