Re: ejabberd vs. Tigase

Hello,

Tomasz Sterna wrote:

> Dnia 2009-05-06, śro o godzinie19:47 -0400, Dan Le pisze:
>> Has anyone worked with both ejabberd and Tigase and could offer
>> insights on how they compare in terms of performance, resources used
>> (CPU, RAM), community support, ease of use, and the like?

I can only speak for ejabberd, but there should be more than 10000
deployments around the world running ejabberd and ranging from very
small to very large deployments.

Regarding consumption, ejabberd is probably the one that can be tuned
to the smallest size. We have been running ejabberd with 500
simultaneous users on a Linux PDA.

Regarding the large size deployments, we have many very large
deployments (currently working on several one supporting more that a
million simultaneous online users). You can tune it and tweak it to fit
your need. You can do thing which are not possible with other server in
a very short amount of time.

Regarding pubsub as well, feedback from current deployment is very
good. Supporting millions of nodes with large number of items is
possible. It is also very flexible thanks to its plugin architecture.
We plan to give more details soon on the very large scale pubsub
projects we are working on.

You can contact me privately if you want to discuss your project in more
details.

-- 
Mickaël Rémond
 http://www.process-one.net/
_______________________________________________
JAdmin mailing list
FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jadmin-faq
Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=19
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jadmin
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________