Re: Active Buddy patent application on "Bots" (rewritten to reduce size)
Iain Shigeoka <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jan 2003 21:41:30 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.im-patents |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BA57638A.12600%[email protected]> |
On 1/23/03 10:52, "Bob Wyman" <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> The fact that there are over 700 pending patent applications >> containing the phrase instant messaging is pretty scary. > Yes, very scary. The IM space is being locked up by patents very > quickly but it isn't the only space with a similar problem. For > instance, there are currently 372 patent applications that contain the > phrase "Session Initiation Protocol" (many of these are not IM related). > The SIP space is being pinned down in a terrible way... > >> it would take me a year to work through the backlog. > The most important thing to do here is to keep up to date on new > patents and new applications. It is *very* important to keep up to date > on new applications since there is a tiny, two-month window during which > third-parties are able to submit prior art to the PTO that will be > considered in the patent granting process. This is a relatively new At this rate I don't think we can manage without help and tools. Sounds like another JSF web project... :) Isn't there some other website where they post patents and ask people for prior art that would invalidate them? I think we might have better luck with getting other members to share the load if people could volunteer an hour or two in a clear cut task. Reading through a patent to see if it warrants attention seems to nicely fall into that category if we could make it easy to 'take ownership' of a particular patent review. -iain