Re: Should XEP features with apparent impact be hidden to older clients?
Schimon Jehudah <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 12:04:37 -0500 Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > >I was wondering whether some features, which have visual impact on > >messages, should have XML Namespaces (xmlns). > > This is already how everything works. Sorry. I was not aware of it. I changed the title. So, how is it that older clients *do* display contents of elements with xmlns that is not supported? is there a directive in the RFC specifications of the XMPP standard which recommends to realize only elements of supported xmlns? _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]