Re: Should XEP features with apparent impact be hidden to older clients?
Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Somebody claiming to be Schimon Jehudah wrote: >On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 12:04:37 -0500 >Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >I was wondering whether some features, which have visual impact on >> >messages, should have XML Namespaces (xmlns). >> >> This is already how everything works. > >Sorry. I was not aware of it. I changed the title. > >So, how is it that older clients *do* display contents of elements with >xmlns that is not supported? They don't. Most XMPP apps for most features choose to intentionally add "fall back" content, that is content in more widely-supported namespaces. In order to avoid having apps miss some content only because it is in a format they don't understand. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEWeaCw+rzmiEMpzU00RwpEc5RnN4FAmk5wmQACgkQ0RwpEc5R nN4j2g//UKSAeH2ktmVyqtfeEGTNfExMp8O251hGi65mjqyuxj+Yf7yV+sUIEpOU q2TICM9Ry9o7V6A1bxVTJWR3d03fbMCoKh6eG2q5r4z3wPL+iybVU6r5JP9X/gHP NVjbqHvur0M7yzxevrUDEkj1KnQvcEYkMyfv0FMEYh6HwWnRZLrEhKGLsBb8zbkX C4xV2dFMqjbqwfRyTRcuqHFE6jeZvkYpbxn0YW+2mtwYbmHubx6woFjfVcFTL9Ua Yvbvfcupw8yg0g/vrAJvhNt1Smc14HvCx714b9l8WrDq4pehHYuiNbEyjgDhuJNa n8ZfOKoFAMaReayfOpIFojtQ32CDwgLVcXo7Dz1KOvZnYXHZRPDgE/toKx6aygTg UP6VzARBPrEhiqyeJbtesbHbgHdmz7vsctlU9eW8+SSeEAQtkuajfMyHSYxSUVn+ ijk3Cm8uNIGkXLK+9yCS8ON48sqZvHc2gYBQKgea8ni9SWmrOKJwSOJubEEFm602 jIqpiG4bXnGEFP9GyBTXPvQIcGWrnTa9wsn9GYPN5vQoJ8sM5Vgf06W2+Z0nh75J 7ZwlU2g+4QH802M5VYiG2GgMfl1IV7BSUExdbDPDmwfbbAWOlHCnzWDl/jztSmcE Y7sT0LPbYaEwHPyfBYRxb+D62Tj2LdgmGDo5ZWnhkc1Y+rsxiMA= =aMTK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----