Re: Presence problem in large MUC rooms.
Goffi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3392413.aeNJFYEL58@tazar3> |
Le vendredi 30 janvier 2026, 11:10:36 heure normale d’Europe centrale Stephen Paul Weber a écrit : > Somebody signing messages as Goffi wrote: > >Le vendredi 30 janvier 2026, 10:52:31 heure normale d’Europe centrale Stephen Paul Weber a écrit : > >> >We don't have to be actively in the room. What we want when we are in a > >> >large room, is to be able to check it when we want, and be notified when we > >> >are mentioned. > >> > >> So you want to have the option to not only not get presence live, but also > >> not get live messages? > > > >??? Why we would not have the live messages? If the client is in the room, it's an "active" join, and it's working as usual. > > Yes but your whole proposal is about adding this "passive" join which I > understood to not want live messages, correct? Yes, for rooms where the client is not actively displaying the chat, and you get notifications when you are mentioned (or we can add another option to get notification for every message, we still skip <presence> in this case). In short the room automatically get from "active" to "passive" when the client is not actively showing it and vice versa. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEsNZvWyEnjW9SVudbKqmcu6xuKwwFAml8h/YACgkQKqmcu6xu KwwIMgf/dscielrCzuzrRZuO0O0jXRLk4wGlPLAkU2hHG+k2/aUk9S3qvz8QGEbG NghNBVyJBnQQyoSJou7VXF4AbwbfHMtvedcDSyWf2P6peQ/SYmIjpwizoG+uSECy DsoAtsF6fDOmNCkH5FGRjSLaJ4+xjDsj/EiiuGMl2oR8V81SAFtLfPiRYdX/yVCG JLeAQ/ylep/zBzr/rH/p41MqPAEFJ/pZ+Py9YcaLMJAZq85wfFIhANSMPim1rYr4 PSHe70Z7PG10sPrl+Go5B8r9vbWd1b2Uu3AVknhN//de33bZXxr4dFyeiDQeTmDg +9/9zTXcasNjW8cgZcbl0VVAqDNMdA== =Mldh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----