Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Link Metadata
Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>Should we, perhaps, consider Metalink (RFC 5854) instead of OpenGraph, >and any other similar solution which be specific to XMPP, for such task? While I expect OpenGraph to be a popular vocabulary here because it is the biggest standard for link metadata, we are not restricted to that by the XEP. TIL metalink, it looks basically identical to the jingle file element (and the sfs file element). Sad that we now have three of these defined instead of collaborating. However it's not really related to the main link metadata use case. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEWeaCw+rzmiEMpzU00RwpEc5RnN4FAmmdzYEACgkQ0RwpEc5R nN6wow//V1AS7Lwnd+iCTcL/1kcR+o8X1je4l246I+9YQfs2pzZvABhIAb4zHJqV 94bjrxfPnorVoBQIyM+LHjLL95WnhXEQeAdDRBQ5Z6tnyCosQarKY+pdHsxS51ED HCry3ZHD5cA0MW0PfTcr/1K7TmPFfq4ibVm59/ta0pGONLxoUFBxjDOpZAek/TbT q/ANUfEkBNgsEaVoABm3b6x3iqUbGP0ImFeU4jJpTHwQLnaeJ8jRditO5LAbTUgI NeXBfQXW6XrUJjkdxkbWercdRtVEGY9BjftUbWdwMbz/XeBzNXs6E23fnFV+WCD6 iyJLL6adItO68OAkQfizS2t8UJmCZfUcDO0frN60KVj3uArMoVZ/4zvOwuZKUGiw vnwF4HFywXSpEuIXV6jAUMEXWB00UAIMMar7pMXBdLTp6QEvr2cFfFLe9nCxjGP4 FZ2bNTdX2zpKgO14yXuFp4jAxRTsmIEbja5Ni9b0vaZKdJGDjH/b08glqWnJ5zOd Nz1GqZIfuOReTI64qbfFlsaIaq3aL6J2ib3QphHexvT2YoNS92TwR583o6p5oVKy zLwvEi71az74BYHFsjeVnMKELr3cwcAQl2wTA/dGPcSjvyUBbWVGS+avul6rs4jy AL6BS2JFiytfyyEcSNPPgvSzZPm6S0luh5385wn4GJb1fwpCQn4= =UAXv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----