Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Link Metadata

Stephen. Good evening.

On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:10:45 -0500
Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]> wrote:

> >Should we, perhaps, consider Metalink (RFC 5854) instead of
> >OpenGraph, and any other similar solution which be specific to XMPP,
> >for such task?  
> 
> While I expect OpenGraph to be a popular vocabulary here because it
> is the biggest standard for link metadata, we are not restricted to
> that by the XEP.
> 
> TIL metalink, it looks basically identical to the jingle file element
> (and the sfs file element). Sad that we now have three of these
> defined instead of collaborating. However it's not really related to
> the main link metadata use case.

Thank you for your answer.

Please, ignore my argument.

I will ask, again, about the adoption of Metalink, and to deprecate
similar XEP extensions in favour of Metalink.

Kind reagrds,
Schimon
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]