Re: Reinstating XHTML-IM (XEP-0071)
Schimon Jehudah via Standards <[email protected]> Sun, 15 Mar 2026 16:06:59 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Martin. Good afternoon. On Sun, 15 Mar 2026 13:53:29 +0000 Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Schimon, hi list, > > On 2026-03-15 03:27, Schimon Jehudah via Standards wrote: > > I am not an XSF member, yet I am interested to reinstate XHTML-IM. > > > > I have useful ideas that would be possible with XHTML-IM. > > I used to be in favour of XHTML-IM, too, but now I'm not convinced > anymore myself. Let's talk about use cases first. I see: > > 1. Blogging with rich structure, like sections/subsections and tables. > If I'm not mistaken, XHTML-IM only has poor support for the former > (H1..H6 instead of "real" sections like e.g. DocBook/XML) and no > support for the latter. > > 2. Chatting or blogging with enriched syntax, like bold/italic, or > clickable links. > > For the former, XHTML-IM as it is now, is not sufficient, IMHO. Both > XEP-0277: Microblogging over XMPP and XEP-0472: Pubsub Social Feed > refer to Atom and XHTML, but unfortunately recommend the XHTML-IM > subset. > I suppose that, the HTML support of XHTML-IM is designedly limited. I do not think that it should be an issue, and I think that it is fine. Those who are interested to have a complete XHTML experience, could utilize Atomsub (XEP-0277 or XEP-0472), and developers can add publishing capabilities to XMPP clients; and I certainly encourage developers to do so, and add publishing capabilities to XMPP clients. > For the latter, we have XEP-0393: Message Styling and XEP-0394: > Message Markup. Which are missing clickable links, but that could be > added or we rely on XEP-0511: Link Metadata? > Link Metadata is a recent addition, which I think is good, and is specifically associated with URI links. Yet, XHTML-IM is designed to craft custom messages, and unlike Markdown, XHTML is well defined; and, if XHTML are impressively crafted, they could even prompt people to think of newer ideas to XMPP. Of course, XHTML-IM COULD be abused by overwhelming people with a vast amount of graphics formattings and other custom elements, which might annoy people. > Cheers Schimon _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]