Re: SNMP Disk Space Negative Values
"Mr. James W. Laferriere" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.mrtg.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Christian , While no expert , I (off the top of my head) think may be a wrap around error for Snmp-V1 try snmp-V2 , add ":::::2" to the end of the query string . Hth , JimL On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Christian Arnaut wrote: > Am attempting to use MRTG to monitor disk space on a Windows Server as I have done on multiple servers and workstations in the past. However, this time the local storage capacity on the local drive partition is nearly 15TB. > > It appears that I have exceeded an SNMP threshold where the integer values are now negative numbers. For example to monitor total space on the C: drive I used (simplified)... iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.4.2 * iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.6.2 > > iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.3.2 = STRING: "C:\\ Label:" > iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.3.4 = STRING: "E:\\ Label:" > iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.4.2 = INTEGER: 4096 > iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.4.4 = INTEGER: 4096 > iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.5.2 = INTEGER: 10350335 > iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.5.4 = INTEGER: -268468737 > iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.6.2 = INTEGER: 6261795 > iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.6.4 = INTEGER: -527400222 > > With the E: drive, iso.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.4.4 correctly shows the cluster size (4096). However, I am sure the total number of clusters isn't '-527400222'. Even if I used the absolute value of 527400222, the numbers don't add up to the 15TB partition size. > > Any suggestions? Or have I reached the limitation of MRTG for the purpose I am looking for? > > > Thank you, in advance, for any assistance! > > ~Christian > -- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS | | Network&System Engineer | 3237 Holden Road | Give me Linux | | [email protected] | Fairbanks, AK. 99709 | only on AXP | +------------------------------------------------------------------+