Re: Misplaced advice in the Nagios preflight check?
Travis Runyard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nagios.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANCZ1yHahNuvo71VVCgbca6_N-xeP90zc8nFCNce76GXtRmWRg@mail.gmail.com> |
This is by design, and it is only a warning message. The config is valid and should work as you intended. It doesn't make sense to get a recovery notification for something you never knew was a problem. "Unknowns" are not considered problems in Nagios logic. On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Chris Beattie <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/7/2013 9:28 AM, C. Bensend wrote:> > > Not real sure why Nagios doesn't think that's a valid config - I > > want a contact that will receive only UNKNOWN alerts for services. > > Have you tried giving that contact the extra options Nagios wants, and > then defining a service escalation for that contact with the > escalation_options directive set to u? > > -- > -Chris > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Nagios-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when > reporting any issue. > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null