Re: Misplaced advice in the Nagios preflight check?

"C. Bensend" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nagios.user
Message-ID <7dcea29043f1544d47f8d4990e798fbb.squirrel@webmail.stinkweasel.net>
> Have you tried giving that contact the extra options Nagios wants, and
> then defining a service escalation for that contact with the
> escalation_options directive set to u?

No, I haven't.  It *seems* to be working as I intend.  My question is
more as to why Nagios seems to think it's a bad idea, when it's a
perfectly legitimate configuration.  Are there unforeseen consequences
that I'm not aware of?  Or was it just not a configuration anyone
thought would be useful/valid, so it is warned about?


-- 
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere,
someone said to themselves, 'You know, I want to set those people
over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.'"  
                       -- George Carlin


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.