Re: Subagents lose connection to master if no reply from inform destination

John Forsyth <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I ran snmpd with logging and  -Dagentx. Here is the error message I am seeing:

agentx_build: packet built okay
agentx/master: FAILED 32 -12 Failure in sendto (Broken pipe)
agentx/master: handle pdu (req=0x49d28177,trans=0x0,sess=0xd)
agentx/master: in register_agentx_list
agentx/master: registered ok
agentx/master: send response, stat 0 (req=0x49d28177,trans=0x0,sess=0xd)
agentx_build: packet built okay
agentx/master: handle pdu (req=0x49d28177,trans=0x0,sess=0xd)
agentx/master: in register_agentx_list
netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed
/tmp/gate/src/packages/net-snmp/agent/agent_registry.c:542
netsnmp_subtree_load()

This repeat several times. When all trap destinations are reachable,
this error message does not occur.

John

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:37 AM, John Forsyth<[email protected]> wrote:
> I am running into an issue where several subagents lose their AgentX
> connection to snmpd master, all giving the following error message:
>
> "AgentX master agent failed to respond to ping.  Attempting to re-register"
>
> This occurs after they successfully connect to snmpd.
>
> I have two v3 inform destinations configured using the trapsess
> derective in snmpd.conf:
>
> trapsess -v 3 -r 2 -t 15 -u <user> -l authNoPriv -A <pass> -a MD5 -Ci
> 10.11.10.18
> trapsess -v 3 -r 2 -t 15 -u <user> -l authNoPriv -A <pass> -a MD5 -Ci
> 10.11.10.19
>
> The second one I eventually discovered, was un-reachable.
>
> When I removed this inform destination. the subagents did not lose
> their connection. Also, if I set the retry & timeouts to 0 for the
> un-reachable inform destination, the subagents do not lose their
> connection.
>
> So, I am left with the conclusion that some how having a "bad" inform
> destination effects the agentx connection between master and
> subagents.
>
> I encounter the same issue whether I configure to use Unix domain
> sockets, or TCP sockets for the AgentX connection.
>
> I realize that having an "un-reachable" trap destination configured is
> not ideal. But, I would like to avoid having this effect the subagents
> if possible.
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
> System:
> Debian Linux, Net-Snmp 5.4.2
>
> John
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.