Re: Delay in processing get next request for host MIB tree
Dave Shield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.net-snmp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 20 April 2010 10:38, A Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > When I issue getnext command, it takes around 6 sec to process a > request for OIDs under host MIB; for example: > % snmpgetnext -v2c -cpublic -t30 10.0.6.103 > HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrSystemMaxProcesses.0 > .. > .. > HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrMemorySize.0 = INTEGER: 897832 KBytes > but snmpget returns without delay: > % snmpget -v2c -cpublic -t30 10.0.6.103 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrMemorySize.0 > HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrMemorySize.0 = INTEGER: 897832 KBytes GET is inherently a simpler (and faster) request than GETNEXT. But 6s seems excessive. What happens if you compare the response times of snmpget ... hrMemorySize.0 and snmpgetnext .... hrMemorySize Is anything being logged by the agent? Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users