Re: snmpd crash after "response to proxy request illegal. We're screwed"

Dave Shield <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.net-snmp.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 30 March 2011 10:03, Tomasz Chmielewski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>     -   snmpget -v 2c -c public  localhost:1161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
>>                       .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9

My apologies - that should have been

    snmpget -v 2c -c public  localhost:1161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.9
.1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.2


> # snmpwalk -v 2c -c public  localhost:1611 .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10
> SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.34039.10.1.1.1.0 = STRING: "Version: v2.1.6-53-g8ef652f"
         :
> SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.34039.10.1.2.2.1.2.0 = STRING: "1761.0"
> Timeout: No Response from localhost:1611


Hmmm...

What happens with:

    -   snmpgetnext -v 2c -c public localhost:1611   .1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.2

    -   snmpgetnext -v 2c -c public localhost:1611
.1.3.6.1.4.1.34039.10.1.9999

?

Dave

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software 
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker 
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.