Would like to confirm ...

Hi all,

I was debating, if my handler should handle all varbindings in a request or
just the first. Realized, I just need to handle only one, even if it has a
non null "next".

What the frame work does, when we use "snmpget ... OID1 OID2", it sends to
the handler two requests.

request1 points to varbindings1 { oid1 } --> varbindings2 {oid2 }

request2 points to varbindings2 { oid2 }

Please confirm, if this is the standard behavior to rely on.

// Spew from my program
Calling RcvrTableHandler handler(sFlowRcvrTable) mode (160)

----------------------------------------------
RcvrTableHandler:: handle request: 0x866e210
handle_a_rcvr_table_request:
netsnmp_variable_list:
var=0x866d210 { (.1.3.6.1.4.1.14706.1.1.4.1.1.1) len(13) }    <--- bindings1
var=0x866d460 { (.1.3.6.1.4.1.14706.1.1.4.1.1.2) len(13) }    <--- bindings2

handle_a_rcvr_table_request row=(1) col=(1)    <-- from bindings 1
handle_a_rcvr_table_request row=(2) col=(1)    <-- from bindings 2

----------------------------------------------
RcvrTableHandler:: handle request: 0x866e250             <-- Second request
handle_a_rcvr_table_request:
netsnmp_variable_list:
var=0x866d460 { (.1.3.6.1.4.1.14706.1.1.4.1.1.2) len(13) }   <-- bindings2:
*NOTE* netsnmp_variable_list pointer is same as second pointer in previous
request.

handle_a_rcvr_table_request row=(2) col=(1)  <-- from bingdings2

Thank you,
Renuka

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users