Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 randomly loosing layer-2 on a port

Shawn L <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.cisco
Message-ID <CAMOTM_RHE=m1fiGMF1mTM_tD+yRnU3Nx5u6Udww9g9HfUVPxZg@mail.gmail.com>
We upgraded the 920 to 16.12.06 this morning.  No change.  Still not
learning MAC addresses on port te0/0/4.  So, back to the drawing board.

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 1:31 PM Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 04:47:57PM +0000, Brian Turnbow wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 03:59:02PM +0000, Brian Turnbow wrote:
> > > > Yep, sounds like the infamous uptime over 2 years "feature" from 3.16
> > > (something)..
> > > > Reboot and upgrade was the only way we fixed it....
> > >
> > > Uh.  Could you elaborate on what that "feature" is, exactly?
> >
> > It was the bug where after after two years of uptime
> > If an interface went down it would stick as up and not pass traffic
> > You could not provision new interfaces.
> > Counters also stopped working. (we used this to find affected units)
>
> Now THAT is interesting.  I'm a bit further distanced from day-to-day
> operations these days (otherwise I might have noticed), but indeed,
> counters didn't work anymore either.  "No traffic on this box!" which
> I know to be not true (our daily TSM backups go through there...) - and
> after reboot, "Traffic!".
>
> Very interesting.  "Interface itself" counters are all "0", but service
> instance counters (gi0/0/2 si 90) still show traffic.  So that's actually
> something our alarming could trigger on "si has > 1 Mbit, interface itself
> has 0"...
>
> [..]
> > Sounds like it may be different.
> > Did the counters work?
> > Maybe they decided to add it into 16.06 , you never know what a BU may
> decide is a must have feature....
>
> Obviously, 16.06 has much improved performance, so 2-year-bugs are now
> hit after 0.5 years already!
>
> OTOH... seems it wasn't actually 27 weeks uptime, but quite a bit more,
> which was just distorted by SNMP uptime wrapping (and our prometheus
> instance not properly distinguishing this for old data, it only recently
> learned to query that other OID).
>
> So, definitely more than 2 years, and traffic counters stopped some 5
> months
> ago...  and we did not try to actually bring up anything new since then.
>
> Yeah, thanks a lot for this information.  This will be very helpful to
> avoid needless frustration by our on-site people ("it does not link! can
> you please try a different cable?  did you get the patch right?").
>
> gert
>
> --
> "If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
>  feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never
> doubted
>  it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
>                              Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh
> Mistress
>
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.