Re: [c-nsp] MTU and PMTUD

Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.cisco
Message-ID <CAAeewD_L0yWhf+be7giRnUaO1BQ8Qp2KoZm9VBkFAq_FX7B=eQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 11:40, Marcin Kurek <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >  https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8654.html
>
> Thanks!
>
> > But it was [8936, 1240].min - so it was 'negotiated' here to the
> > smallest? If you change the 8936 end to 1239, then that will be used,
> > regardless who starts it.
>
> Yes, but why would XR advertise 1240 if I'm using 'tcp mss 8936' for that neighbor?
> Initially I thought that the whole point of this command is to set MSS to a fixed value of our choice.

I may have misunderstood you. Ddi you have 8936 configured on both
ends? I thought you had only 8936 on the CSR.

How I understood it:

*Dec  8 11:17:15.453: TCP0: Connection to 12.0.0.7:179, advertising MSS 8936
*Dec  8 11:17:15.456: TCP: tcb 7FFB9A6D64C0 connection to
12.0.0.7:179, peer MSS 1240, MSS is 1240

Local 12.0.0.13 CSR is advertising 8936 to remote 12.0.0.7
Remote 12.0.0.7 is advertising 1240
We settle to 1240

I guess you are saying the remote 12.0.0.7 is as well configured to
8936? Then I agree, I wouldn't expect that, and can't explain it.
Almost sounds like a bug where the configuration command is only read
when IOS-XR establishes the connection, but not when it receives it?

-- 
  ++ytti
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.