Re: [c-nsp] MTU and PMTUD
Lukasz Bromirski via cisco-nsp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Marcin, I did some benchmarking back in ~2008-2009 (with 12.2.31SB and 12.2SR, who still remembers that?), and we (Cisco) fixed numerous non optimized paths in the routing code. But that was over a decade ago, so I’ll limit bragging about it ;) There are two presentations, quoted from about that time I can find some references to, which show in general terms what improvements you can expect. XR code was however way more optimized right from the start, and specially over last 5 years there was a lot additional work done to optimize it. Anyway - Cisco BGP stack is still limited to 4kB message for BGP (as far as I know), so we still don’t implement RFC 8654 neither in XR or XE. I can check that with developers, but last time I’ve heard it’s only on roadmap. In the end you’ll get about 2.5-3x improvement using MTU 9k, but the actual BGP messages inside will still be limited to 4k. Back in the day, in my testbed, that made 7200VXR with NPE-G1 converge in about 21 seconds versus a minute with ~600k prefixes and 100 sessions. Most of the benefits are coming BTW from the fact its lesser amount of packets in BGP communication (to Ytti point) as for real-world BGP table, the packing of attributes and updates with 4k vs 1.3-1.5k is better, but only by so much. Again, the old numbers I’m quoting are back from the day when IOS was monolithic, now with CSR you’re using for testing, IOS-XE should handle that way more smoothly even under stress. Running 9k MTU is anyway recommended for BGP RR scenarios, as many core SP networks (and some Enterprises) run 9k MTU in the core anyway. You’ll get less bursts for initial convergence and then ongoing session maintenance thanks to less packets. Some very old recommendations (again, remember ISP Best Practices guide v2.9?) about interface hold buffers and SPD tuning will no longer apply obviously. -- ./ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEVBv2AKcw1EpJVQiKaa++EphLmgMFAmOR0dgACgkQaa++EphL mgOYexAAhcPsOwAwY8o2DjIQH9LvyomMx9Sa3uGbr4x8hNagUGkBnpwfxntEyUXD fYl+lyLXVyW5JOxDXnVd5c35S6Xw4oDpyR6RRy1k6qASl7qvYmVQxdmV+XsFwvT8 8fHO7h5Hc+TRWvTVmAq3PnlFCYsYPJnd9cmTd6EXht0l9tQVTIBl3+8Bwod12zZl ZnHkkjj2JIv9sXDaHz6dFCVr8S0Bi/OqoSwJwqLgYPPZ25nD4S9XNroCbaHDirks Ls8W7K7wM3X4YWEBx4/wfd/uhSorWcM30Rf4sbkkNA8jOmQx1ZsDMSAX5rPbrbqg Id7vG6/tEC3wvi5lP67Pp1rS0f4MMEZmatwOxvI3Uh8+kbp+ZqJ/YV5o6MxvXEWT EprS00V6j56f70VDV2qxxUKGUP5avf7l47Jl4T7JZoyZmTqlMuUhPp8uT6+020BI gF2DXA6/IuAQuxf7+JF1lkElnIn7d95m4Ya/oHW8fjFA9FoSFzXHbvX9Gz27Dz1t b7bzuObHm57OQadoet3NTlYzV7+psO0P1AMpSQG2A4xMYK+jRkziTSejR8zlFK71 3BTJ43yAhat6slwaBP7E4UKFkyHuE35aMKvg2ySGsSiADo8PLAFP8oT/02TtB79H VIiMTbipcgI8W+z2AKan45rJPgeDKv7jzXFWYkolTUCnUsCSmy8= =8DtV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----