Re: [c-nsp] Internet border router recommendations and experiences
Thomas Scott via cisco-nsp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALHr=U4Ag7rOXrV-tDr9C+g8rQZB0nWjoNvmqcanr5QE-fr8qw@mail.gmail.com> |
Yes - 400 Gbps throughput total If I recall correctly. > The MX204 has four rate-selectable ports that can be configured as 100-Gigabit Ethernet ports or 40-Gigabit Ethernet ports, or each port can be configured as four 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports (by using a breakout cable). The MX204 also has eight 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports. The four rate-selectable ports support QSFP28 and QSFP+ transceivers, whereas the eight 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports support SFP+ transceivers https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/hardware/mx204/topics/concept/mx204-description.html Best Regards, -Thomas Scott On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 5:19 PM Eric Louie via cisco-nsp < [email protected]> wrote: > Oh geez, I just realized I left a zero off the interface - we need 100G > interfaces both upstream (x1) and downstream (x2) > That probably changes the product choices a little bit. > Anyone with 100G Internet feeds want to let me know what you're using for > a border router? I saw one reply for Arista already. > Does the MX204 have 100GE interfaces and throughput? > -e- > > Eric Louie > 619-743-5375 Cell/text > Stay in this moment, it's the only one you really have > Take the time to be compassionate today > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 12:43:52 PM PST, Mark Tinka > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 2/22/23 20:29, Eric Louie wrote: > > > Mark, thanks. We were quoted a MX304 for the Internet edge from > Juniper. How has your experience been with it? are you 10G upstream and > downstream? Any IPS on the 10G connection? > > The MX304 is not worth the money, for as long as the MX204 exists. > > > > > We tried an NCS-5501 and it was a disaster, in a word. The 10G > interface, uRPF, source-based blackholing, and routing table depth with > Cisco is a limiting factor in their product line. > > Broadcom-based systems should always be looked at with one eye open, > i.e., test test test before you commit. This applies to any vendor, not > just Cisco. > > Mark. > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/