Re: [c-nsp] Internet border router recommendations and experiences
Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/23/23 00:19, Eric Louie wrote: > Oh geez, I just realized I left a zero off the interface - we need > 100G interfaces both upstream (x1) and downstream (x2) > > That probably changes the product choices a little bit. > > Anyone with 100G Internet feeds want to let me know what you're using > for a border router? I saw one reply for Arista already. > > Does the MX204 have 100GE interfaces and throughput? For 100Gbps peering and transit, we have moved way from the MX480 to the MX204. This makes sense for us because we separate peering and transit, and you don't need a massive chassis to handle all of this if you peer or pick up transit in 2 or more locations. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/