Re: [c-nsp] Internet border router recommendations and experiences
Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.cisco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/23/23 21:45, Shawn L via cisco-nsp wrote: > That's one of the major reasons we're sticking with the ASR920 in metro > deployments for all it's faults. They do silly license stuff on the 12SZ > (no bulk, make all the 10G ports work license) but once you figure out > their quirks they do work quite well. > > We did just receive a 9901 (purchased 6 months ago). It seems nice but > again, licensing. Want to put more than 120G worth of optics, add a > license. And reboot. Really, reboot? That just seems silly in this day > and age. Exactly - the Metro will usually see 100's - 1000's of devices. IOS XE is nice and simple for such applications. In fact, Junos too. For IOS XR, it's just too heavy for that sort of thing. Okay in the data centre where we are aggregating a ton of customers and/or Metro-E rings, but not out in the Metro. The Metro calls for a more agile OS. There are simply way too many devices to be dealing with the issue you mention, updating SMU's, rebooting, e.t.c., just to get a functionality and/or a bug fix from IOS XR. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/