Re: back_ldap / TLS Issues with OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4_48

Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.openldap.devel
Message-ID <8C2495FF8CAD7D17C02188C9@[192.168.1.39]>
--On Sunday, July 21, 2019 3:37 PM +0100 Howard Chu <[email protected]> wrote:

>> --On Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:51 AM +0100 Howard Chu <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The behavior is supposed to be exactly as specified in the manpages.
>>>
>>
> A syncrepl consumer is an LDAP client. A back-ldap backend is an LDAP
> client.


Now you are providing conflicting answers.  The man page for back-ldap 
makes zero reference to ldap.conf(5).  It only mentions slapd.conf(5).  The 
syncrepl section of slapd.conf(5)/slapd-config(5) only mention the 
network-timeout value being pulled in from ldap.conf(5).  So which is it? 
Do they follow the man page behaviors (which would mean no ldap.conf(5) for 
slapd-ldap, and only network-timeout for syncrepl), or do they violate the 
man page description?


Generally, it seems to me we at the least have a documentation bug, in that 
back-ldap(5) and the syncrepl section of slapd.conf(5)/slapd-config(5) 
should note that they will rely on ldap.conf(5) in the absence of TLS (and 
possibly other paremters) if they are not found in slapd.conf(5).

Additionaly, what should we do about ITS#8427? It was clearly fixing a 
valid bug.  Do we revert it?  Do we fix the behavior so it fixes the bug 
reported, but does not introduce a regression?

And we need to know the answer to that and have a fix in rather quickly.

--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.