Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] 1 year wait before re-voting
"Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennic.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
That would just make things confusing in a "what counts as what" way. -- -Dan Q On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:39:12 -0400, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > It may be good to have to be based on the type of proposal, e.g. TLD > vs. infrastructure proposals. > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 5:19 AM, Sebastian Makowiecki > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I suppose it just makes sense that failed proposals should not be repeated > > too soon. A 'no' means 'no' (and a 'yes' means 'yes'), not 'perhaps in the > > near future'. Some cooldown period would ensure that same proposals cannot > > be suggested too frequently. > > > > I can see how to some a period of a year or even 8 months can be quite too > > long for some (especially in today's world). I suppose a shorter period > > would make more sense, where there is a grace period after each proposal, > > yet also the "Great Project of OpenNIC" remains reformable. > > > > I'd like to change my suggestion to 4 months of 'cool-down' period (I > > previosly suggested 8 months). > > ~ Sebastian Makowiecki > > > > On Tue, 10 Jul, 2018 at 6:10 AM, Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > As with the voting procedures proposed by Jonah, half of which were voted > > into official OpenNIC policy, a fixed waiting period between duplicate > > proposals will ensure integrity and stability. -- -Dan Q On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 > > 21:44:07 -0700, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I should have added in my last email: To whom does this make a difference? ~ > > Ole On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 14:28:48 -0400 (EDT) "Daniel Quintiliani" > > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > There has been a problem of people trying > > to hold new > votes too recently after their proposals lose. This > includes > > Jonah's proposals to replace IRC with Discord > and Sympa with Discourse, > > and someone who lost I think > the .front TLD, and I did so myself with the > > .free/.libre > thing. > > I propose there be a one year (365 day) waiting > > period > before anyone can bring proposals back up for a new vote. > > What > > do you think? > > -- > > -Dan Q -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC > > Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing > > [email protected] > > > > -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe > > by emailing [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > -------- > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] > > > > > -------- > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]