Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] 1 year wait before re-voting

Well it would or it wouldn't, it could make sense. Don't ask me aboit the details though ;)

On 11 July 2018 17:29:39 GMT+01:00, Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> wrote:
>That would just make things confusing in a "what counts as what" way.
>
>--
>
>-Dan Q
>
>On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:39:12 -0400, Christopher <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> It may be good to have to be based on the type of proposal, e.g. TLD
>> vs. infrastructure proposals.
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 5:19 AM, Sebastian Makowiecki
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I suppose it just makes sense that failed proposals should not be
>repeated
>> > too soon. A 'no' means 'no' (and a 'yes' means 'yes'), not 'perhaps
>in the
>> > near future'. Some cooldown period would ensure that same proposals
>cannot
>> > be suggested too frequently.
>> >
>> > I can see how to some a period of a year or even 8 months can be
>quite too
>> > long for some (especially in today's world). I suppose a shorter
>period
>> > would make more sense, where there is a grace period after each
>proposal,
>> > yet also the "Great Project of OpenNIC" remains reformable.
>> >
>> > I'd like to change my suggestion to 4 months of 'cool-down' period
>(I
>> > previosly suggested 8 months).
>> > ~ Sebastian Makowiecki
>> >
>> > On Tue, 10 Jul, 2018 at 6:10 AM, Daniel Quintiliani
><[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > As with the voting procedures proposed by Jonah, half of which were
>voted
>> > into official OpenNIC policy, a fixed waiting period between
>duplicate
>> > proposals will ensure integrity and stability. -- -Dan Q On Mon, 9
>Jul 2018
>> > 21:44:07 -0700, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I should have added in my last email: To whom does this make a
>difference? ~
>> > Ole On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 14:28:48 -0400 (EDT) "Daniel Quintiliani"
>> > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > There has been a problem of
>people trying
>> > to hold new > votes too recently after their proposals lose. This >
>includes
>> > Jonah's proposals to replace IRC with Discord > and Sympa with
>Discourse,
>> > and someone who lost I think > the .front TLD, and I did so myself
>with the
>> > .free/.libre > thing. > > I propose there be a one year (365 day)
>waiting
>> > period > before anyone can bring proposals back up for a new vote.
>> > What
>> > do you think? > > -- > > -Dan Q -------- You are a member of the
>OpenNIC
>> > Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> > [email protected]
>> >
>> > -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may
>unsubscribe
>> > by emailing [email protected]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --------
>> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
>[email protected]
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>[email protected]


~
Sebastian Makowiecki



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]