Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Reintroduction of past proposals

Do you realize that the more options there are the less likely this is
going to pass? There should've been first a vote for the month length
(allowing people to pick multiple options as well) and then using the
most popular option in the actual proposal, which would be a regular
yes/no vote.

The reason is simple - you could easily have the majority agree that
there should be a time gap, but since the "no" votes are not split
between the other options, they'll win. Unless you plan to divide the no
(F) votes by the amount of "yes options" (or do something like I
described above) this vote is not very democratic.


On 14.07.2018 2:05, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> Beginning: July 14, 2018, 00:00 UTC
> Ending: July 21, 2018, 00:00 UTC
>
> Original discussion thread (note: the title does not reflect the proposal, as different ideas were proposed during discussion): https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00024.html
>
> -----
>
> Previously failed proposals to create OpenNIC TLDs, and all identical duplicates of proposals which have failed to pass, shall not be introduced for another:
>
> (A) 12 months
> (B) 9 months
> (C) 6 months
> (D) 3 months
> (E) 1 month
> (F) I vote against this change in policy.
>
> This proposal, if passed, shall take effect on September 1, 2018, at 00:00 UTC.
>
> -----
>
> My vote is for B (9 months).
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]