Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1

While my vote was counted as intended, I also now know that whatever 
procedure is being used here is *not* what I understood to be IRV.

Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00135.html
>
> The votes during the first round are:
>
> Daniel Quintiliani: B, C, A, D, E
> Jonah Aragon: H, I, G
> Jacob Bachmeyer: F, G, H, E, D, I
> Niles Rogoff: D, F, G, H, A
> Megan Parat: I, H, G, F, E, D, C, B, A
> Christopher: H, I, G
> Amunak: H, G, I
> vv: I, H
> Sebastian Makowiecki: E, F, G
> Katie Holly (Fusl): I
> Jack Ternan: I
>   

IRV tally of the above votes as I understand IRV:  
<URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant_run-off_voting>

round 1: (considering first preferences)
    B - 1
    D - 1
    E - 1
    F - 1
    H - 3
    I - 4
11 voters; no option has a majority; eliminate A, C, G for getting no 
votes; eliminate last place which is tied between B, D, E, F

round 2: (instant run-off; only H, I remain)
    DQ: null
    JA: H
    JB: H
    NR: H
    MP: I
    C: H
    A: H
    VV: I
    SM: null
    KH: I
    JT: I
totals:  H - 5 / I - 4 / null - 2
11 voters, two exhausted ballots, 9 votes counted

The result would be option H by a 5 - 4 majority.

I move for a follow-up Aye/Nay ratification vote for this result if this 
is to be taken as the outcome.


-- Jacob



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]