Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1

"Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.opennic.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Without getting into the vote counting issues again, if it will stop Jonah from his dunce cap troll proposal, or encourage him to write something professional which does not personally attack me, accuse me of engaging in unethical and fraudulent activity, and mention me by name, I'd be happy to do a yea/nay. The only reason I did a second proposal was because *other* people thought it was unfair. This is exactly what I was trying to stop. This proposal is really not worth it to me, and had I known it would cause all this trouble, I would have told one of the unhappy people to write it themselves.

--

-Dan Q


On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:33:06 -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:

> While my vote was counted as intended, I also now know that whatever 
> procedure is being used here is *not* what I understood to be IRV.
> 
> Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> > https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00135.html
> >
> > The votes during the first round are:
> >
> > Daniel Quintiliani: B, C, A, D, E
> > Jonah Aragon: H, I, G
> > Jacob Bachmeyer: F, G, H, E, D, I
> > Niles Rogoff: D, F, G, H, A
> > Megan Parat: I, H, G, F, E, D, C, B, A
> > Christopher: H, I, G
> > Amunak: H, G, I
> > vv: I, H
> > Sebastian Makowiecki: E, F, G
> > Katie Holly (Fusl): I
> > Jack Ternan: I
> >   
> 
> IRV tally of the above votes as I understand IRV:  
> <URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant_run-off_voting>
> 
> round 1: (considering first preferences)
>     B - 1
>     D - 1
>     E - 1
>     F - 1
>     H - 3
>     I - 4
> 11 voters; no option has a majority; eliminate A, C, G for getting no 
> votes; eliminate last place which is tied between B, D, E, F
> 
> round 2: (instant run-off; only H, I remain)
>     DQ: null
>     JA: H
>     JB: H
>     NR: H
>     MP: I
>     C: H
>     A: H
>     VV: I
>     SM: null
>     KH: I
>     JT: I
> totals:  H - 5 / I - 4 / null - 2
> 11 voters, two exhausted ballots, 9 votes counted
> 
> The result would be option H by a 5 - 4 majority.
> 
> I move for a follow-up Aye/Nay ratification vote for this result if this 
> is to be taken as the outcome.
> 
> 
> -- Jacob
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.