Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennic.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Quintiliani wrote: > It didn't matter how the votes were counted, it was that I was told "last place loses" and then posted the exact language of how things were continued, whether it was instant runoff or not. Then Jonah, who asked for permission to audit the votes, went ahead to claim the right to count the votes, when Jonah does not have that right, with ANYONE, to count the votes for them. > When you posted the call for the vote, you declared it "instant runoff". When there was confusion after I submitted an IRV ballot with partial preferences because there were options that I would not support, I knew there would be trouble. Further, in OpenNIC, we do our voting in public on the mailing list: *EVERYONE* has the right to count the votes, but the submitter of the proposal is expected to *post* a count of the votes, which is taken to be official if no one objects. After you posted a count that was clearly *not* IRV, ***I*** posted a count of the votes following the IRV process, for which you are now accusing /Jonah/ of doing something wrong. I understand that both of our names start with "J" and initials "JA" and "JB" are very similar, but we are two different people. -- Jacob -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]