Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1
"Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennic.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jonah and I have proposed this more polite way to overturn the two proposals and force yea/nay on future votes: https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-08/msg00010.html https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-08/msg00012.html Not sure when Jonah will introduce it, but it must be the 7th at least. I will also be revising the "No troll/attack votes" as "Opinions and allegations in proposals" with two adjustments and examples given in a new discussion thread. -- -Dan Q On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 20:30:38 -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > After seeing these proposals in action lately I’m convinced all votes going forward should be exclusively yay/nay votes. > I disagree here. IRV and other models can be very useful for reducing > an "adjustable" proposal to a simple "make this change"/"keep status > quo" option, as occurred in this case. > -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]