Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Opinions and allegations in proposals

While I don't necessarily disagree with the idea that our proposals and 
such should be free of criticisms of members and allegations, I don't 
think we need to add more (mostly meaningless) buerocracy and rules to 
the process. I also see this as a reactionary and maybe even "in 
protest" proposal, and find that childish and stupid.

Therefore I vote "no", against this proposal.


On 2018-08-09 02:28, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> Voting starts: 8/9/2018 0030 UTC
> Voting ends: 8/16/2018 0030 UTC
>
> OpenNIC proposals shall not contain, in full or in part, language which:
>
> * Praises an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
> * Condemns an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
> * Makes allegations of unethical or illegal activity by an OpenNIC member, unless confirmed by a court of law, and/or
> * Criticizes or comments on a proposal or vote, past or present, whether passed or failed, in which an OpenNIC member is criticized on basis of their character or actions.
>
> The proposal shall take effect immediately after passing.
>
> These rules are only applicable to proposals put up for vote, not to mailing list or IRC discussion.
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]