Re: [opennic-discuss] Thoughts on Code of Conduct (and lack thereof)

Amunak <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.opennic.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I would like to point out the irony in your statement when you say this:


On 2018-08-09 08:47, Verax wrote:
> I agree with this sentiment.  Codes of conduct have a deservedly bad 
> reputation as bureaucratic fluff that caters to people who make a 
> hobby of warping those things to suit their aims.  We do not need one.

...while we currently have an ongoing /vote/ to implement what is, 
essentially, a code of conduct for proposals, at least as far as 
criticizing OpenNIC members in proposal goes.

There is nothing wrong about having a set of rules or recommendations on 
how to write to the mailing list, how to behave and how to be nice to 
others, even if it's not actually really enforced. It still helps give 
some moral code that should be common to all members.

What I don't like when is when it becomes official rules that have to be 
followed to the letter and when it makes some people police others 
(which is what the current vote is, IMO, doing).



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.