Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS][MISSCOUNT] Invalidate previous votes

"Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.opennic.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Apologies, I misunderstood you and the results.

Either way, the spoiled votes are here. I don't know why you think it's a problem when the spoiled votes are literally in this message.

--

-Dan Q


On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:28:19 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki <[email protected]> wrote:

> Therefore it was counted once? Where is the issue now Mr Issues?
> 
> ~ 
> Sebastian Makowiecki
> 
> On 15 August 2018 09:25:57 GMT+01:00, Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> wrote:
> >You don't have the right to two spoiled votes any more than anyone has
> >the right to two legitimate votes.
> >
> >--
> >
> >-Dan Q
> >
> >On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:21:37 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> The overall number of spoiled votes equals to three which is correct.
> >I got carried away and casted two separate invalid votes, which also
> >were noted. All seems in order.
> >> 
> >> ~ 
> >> Sebastian Makowiecki
> >> 
> >> On 15 August 2018 01:17:41 GMT+01:00, Jonah Aragon
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >This is a democracy, the original proposer can vote as they please.
> >> >Like I mentioned in Discord, the proposer not voting would be like
> >the
> >> >president not voting on Election Day. Ridiculous. 
> >> >
> >> >Also it looks like your count has the same outcome, I’m not sure
> >what
> >> >the deal is. Additionally, you have two “spoiled” votes by the same
> >> >person in your count, that’s especially incorrect. 
> >> >
> >> >Jonah
> >> >
> >> >> On Aug 14, 2018, at 4:44 AM, Philipp Schafft
> ><[email protected]>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> Good morning,
> >> >> 
> >> >>> On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 22:12 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> >> >>> Results:
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Yes:
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Daniel Quintiliani
> >> >>> Katie Holly
> >> >>> Alex Hanselka
> >> >>> vv
> >> >>> Grant Baron
> >> >>> Jack Ternan
> >> >>> sy
> >> >>> gp
> >> >>> Megan Parat
> >> >>> Jacob Bachmeyer
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> No:
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Christopher
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Passed 10-1.
> >> >>> Effective as of August 16, 2018.
> >> >> 
> >> >> I count differently. I must insist on someone else doing a third
> >> >> counting.
> >> >> 
> >> >> (Also I VERY STRONGLY consider the counting by the proposer a bad
> >> >thing
> >> >> and IN NO EVENT trustworthy. Counting of voices MUST be done by
> >> >someone
> >> >> independent.)
> >> >> 
> >> >> I count:
> >> >>        No:
> >> >>              * Christopher <[email protected]>
> >> >> 
> >> >>        Spoiled:
> >> >>              * Amunak <[email protected]>
> >> >>              * Sebastian Makowiecki <[email protected]> in
> >> >>                <[email protected]>
> >> >>              * Sebastian Makowiecki <[email protected]> in
> >> >>                <[email protected]>
> >> >>              * Philipp Schafft <[email protected]>
> >> >> 
> >> >>        Yes:
> >> >>              * Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]>
> >> >>              * Megan Parat <[email protected]>
> >> >>              * [email protected]
> >> >>              * sy <[email protected]>
> >> >>              * Jack Ternan <[email protected]>
> >> >>              * [email protected]
> >> >>              * Grant Baron <[email protected]>
> >> >>              * Alex Hanselka <[email protected]>
> >> >>              * Katie Holly <[email protected]>
> >> >>              * Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> Proposer!
> >> >> 
> >> >> No: 1, Spoiled: 3, Yes: 10
> >> >> Total votes: 14.
> >> >> 
> >> >> No: 1/14 = ~7.14%, Spoiled: 3/14 = ~21.43%, Yes: 10/14 = ~71.43%
> >> >> 
> >> >> 'Yes' would pass.
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> I must also note here that I personally feel that who proposes
> >should
> >> >> not vote at all or vote invalid. It's a matter of kindness and
> >honor.
> >> >> And also often enforced by voting rules.
> >> >> 
> >> >> With best regards,
> >> >> 
> >> >> -- 
> >> >> Philipp.
> >> >> (Rah of PH2)
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> --------
> >> >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> >> >> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >> >[email protected]
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --------
> >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> >> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >[email protected]
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.