[opennic-discuss] I hereby invite Mr. Daniel Quintiliani to actually improve OpenNIC [WAS: Re: [NOT A MISCOUNT][RESULTS] Require English in proposals and votes]]

Good afternoon,

On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 15:27 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> Al Beano changed his vote to No as did Sebastian.
> 
> 2018-08/msg00234.html
> 2018-08/msg00235.html
> 
> 2018-08/msg00131.html
> 2018-08/msg00217.html

Thank you for sharing perfectly useless references.
If you try to provide a link, provide all of it.


> Never before in the history of OpenNIC have changing your votes considered invalid.

There always has been discussion. Search the archive for it!


> Stop being an asshole and causing trouble.

Yes, here are are again: hate, fear, disrespect. The only thing you
actually add to OpenNIC.

While you were having your war on the this list people like Jeff and
Fusl and I have actually improved stuff. I openly invited you to help.

Why not join us and help OpenNIC as well? DOING ACTUAL WORK.

But I make a guess here:
You will not respond to this part of my E-Mail. As you have not
responded to any of my E-Mails that invited you to join as a friend and
help OpenNIC to become better.

All you do is having your wars here on the list. Wars that add a lot of
stress and work to all of us. Doing actual work? No, that's for others.


Prove me wrong! Do actual work!


With best regards,


> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:11:14 +0000, Philipp Schafft <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Good afternoon,
> > 
> > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 20:53 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> > > Yes (6):
> > > 
> > > Daniel Quintiliani
> > > Jonah Aragon
> > > Allen Schultz
> > > Dennis Emory Hannon
> > > Jacob Bachmeyer
> > > Vladimir F.
> > > 
> > > No (7):
> > > 
> > > Amunak
> > > Megan Parat
> > > Jack Ternan
> > > Sebastian Makowiecki*
> > > vv
> > > kevin
> > > Al Beano*
> > > 
> > > Invalid votes:
> > > 
> > > Philipp Schafft ("democracy")
> > > 
> > > * changed from invalid vote
> > > 
> > > Proposal failed to pass, 6-7
> > 
> > I can not second this counting as I come to a different counting.
> > 
> > I count as following:
> > 
> > Yes:
> >       * Vladimir F. <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]>
> >       * Allen Schultz <[email protected]> in <CAP+RUJfu
> >         [email protected]>
> >       * Dennis Emory Hannon <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]>
> >       * Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]>
> >       * Jonah Aragon <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]>
> >       * Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]>
> > 
> > No:
> >       * Amunak <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]>
> >       * Megan Parat <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]>
> >       * Jack Ternan <[email protected]> in
> >         <trinity-42ea374d-b4f4-49c3-b0ee-10010f652460-1534647456998@3c-app-mailcom-lxa13>
> >       * [email protected] in <20180819005723.09dd06b1@SCO>
> >       * kevin <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Spoilt:
> >       * Philipp Schafft <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]>
> >       * Al Beano <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]>
> >       * Al Beano <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]> (invalid as
> >         double voted)
> >       * Sebastian Makowiecki <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]>
> >       * Sebastian Makowiecki <[email protected]> in
> >         <[email protected]> (invalid as
> >         double voted)
> > 
> > Total counts:
> > Yes: 6; No: 5; Spoilt: 3; TOTAL: 14
> > 
> > Relative counts:
> > Yes: 6/14 = ~42.86%; No: 5/14 = ~35.71%; Spoilt: 3/14 = ~21.43%
> > 
> > Therefore:
> > Yes wins with highest number of votes.
> > 
> > 
> > I ask someone to step up and do a 3rd counting.
> > 
> > 
> > With best regards,
> > 
> > 
> > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 20:41:29 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Voting starts: 8/15/2018 0040 UTC
> > > > Voting ends 8/22/2018 0040 UTC
> > > > 
> > > > 1. All OpenNIC proposals put up for vote shall be in the English language.
> > > > 2. All votes for OpenNIC proposals shall be in the English language, and votes which are not in English shall be considered invalid.
> > > > 
> > > > These rules are only applicable to proposals put up for vote, and to the votes themselves. These rules are not applicable to discussions on the mailing list or on IRC.
> > > > 
> > > > The proposal shall take effect immediately after passing.
> > > > 
> > > > This vote shall be done in "Aye/Yes" and "Nay/No" style. Only English language votes shall be accepted.


-- 
Philipp.
 (Rah of PH2)



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]