Re: [opennic-discuss] Vote to keep or drop peering with NameCoin

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1561769738-3952-35
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000617601058c6bdae6"

--000000000000617601058c6bdae6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I=E2=80=99m not surprised at all... from my experience most network admins =
whose
networks get compromised usually are not at all responsive to abuse
complaints... some even have fake/placeholder abuse contact info... so like
I said, I am not at all surprised that orgs like Spamhaus blacklist first
and =E2=80=9Cask questions=E2=80=9D later (or not at all).

Rouben

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 17:56 Jeff Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 06/28/2019 02:36 PM, Brian Greer wrote:
> > That communication happened at all should be seen as a positive.
> >
>
> Just to clarify... Spamhaus did not reach out to opennic to discuss the
> problem, they just started blacklisting our mail servers without
> warning.  Instead, I actually dug around their site and found a contact
> address to try and get a conversation going with them.  That is where I
> received most of the info about the situation, and then worked with them
> to develop the API so our blacklist content could be generated.  Quite
> frankly I still find it really shitty that they knew full well that
> opennic was caught in the middle, and they didn't even bother to try and
> talk to us about it.
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> [email protected]
>
--=20
Rouben

--000000000000617601058c6bdae6
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div><div dir=3D"auto">I=E2=80=99m not surprised at all... from my experien=
ce most network admins whose networks get compromised usually are not at al=
l responsive to abuse complaints... some even have fake/placeholder abuse c=
ontact info... so like I said, I am not at all surprised that orgs like Spa=
mhaus blacklist first and =E2=80=9Cask questions=E2=80=9D later (or not at =
all).</div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Rouben</div>=
<div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">O=
n Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 17:56 Jeff Taylor &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:shdwdrgn@sou=
rpuss.net">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex">On 06/28/2019 02:36 PM, Brian Greer wrote:<br>
&gt; That communication happened at all should be seen as a positive.<br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
Just to clarify... Spamhaus did not reach out to opennic to discuss the <br>
problem, they just started blacklisting our mail servers without <br>
warning.=C2=A0 Instead, I actually dug around their site and found a contac=
t <br>
address to try and get a conversation going with them.=C2=A0 That is where =
I <br>
received most of the info about the situation, and then worked with them <b=
r>
to develop the API so our blacklist content could be generated.=C2=A0 Quite=
 <br>
frankly I still find it really shitty that they knew full well that <br>
opennic was caught in the middle, and they didn&#39;t even bother to try an=
d <br>
talk to us about it.<br>
<br>
<br>
--------<br>
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. <br>
You may unsubscribe by emailing <a href=3D"mailto:discuss-unsubscribe@lists=
.opennicproject.org" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]=
ject.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature" =
data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature">Rouben</div>

--000000000000617601058c6bdae6--

------------=_1561769738-3952-35
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]

------------=_1561769738-3952-35--