Re: [opennms-devel] Refactoring notifications.xml a bit - what do you think?

David Hustace wrote:

> I like all the changes and I think this is an effort that could be
> placed into 1.6 pretty easily.  This isn't a major overhaul of notifd
> like we want for 1.8 and I am willing to test the crap out of it to get
> it in.

I'm not against it going in 1.6, but I'd rather keep the pressure on
making 1.8 come out sooner than later, rather than keep having 1.6 be a
"development" tree.

1.6 should be for low-impact things, IMHO, and even though it's meant to
be config-compatible, this seems high-impact enough that I'd rather we
keep focusing on getting things ready for a 1.8 release in 6 months than
developing more stuff  for 1.6 and having a 1.8 release in 9 months
instead...  I'm afraid of one-more-thing-itis.  =)

-- 
Benjamin Reed
The OpenNMS Group
http://www.opennms.org/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

_______________________________________________
Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ:
http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ

opennms-devel mailing list

To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJGeGVUu+jZtP2Zf4RApn2AJwIlUGzMyBu8OdcdVN3LNjbK0y99ACfdOy1
TAbDZKhJhwEuPSxw5pHOm3Q=
=xV/b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----