[PATCH v2] networking_sitnl: validate netlink replies against the request

Gert Doering <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.openvpn.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: Antonio Quartulli <[email protected]>

sitnl_send() passed every well-formed reply to the callback without
checking it matched the outstanding request: the seq/pid check was
commented out and the sequence number came from time(NULL).

Seed a monotonically increasing sequence number and drop any message
that is not from the kernel (nl_pid 0) or does not echo our port id and
sequence number.

Change-Id: Ie7352dd136cccda2bd6b6e1a36db1a5f27afd8f7
GitHub: fixes OpenVPN/openvpn-private-issues#9
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ralf Lici <[email protected]>
Gerrit URL: https://gerrit.openvpn.net/c/openvpn/+/1782
---

This change was reviewed on Gerrit and approved by at least one
developer. I request to merge it to master.

Gerrit URL: https://gerrit.openvpn.net/c/openvpn/+/1782
This mail reflects revision 2 of this Change.

Acked-by according to Gerrit (reflected above):
Ralf Lici <[email protected]>

        
diff --git a/src/openvpn/networking_sitnl.c b/src/openvpn/networking_sitnl.c
index e6e72d0..7d623a4 100644
--- a/src/openvpn/networking_sitnl.c
+++ b/src/openvpn/networking_sitnl.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@
  * Bind socket to Netlink subsystem
  */
 static int
-sitnl_bind(int fd, uint32_t groups)
+sitnl_bind(int fd, uint32_t groups, uint32_t *local_pid)
 {
     socklen_t addr_len;
     struct sockaddr_nl local;
@@ -232,6 +232,14 @@
         return -EINVAL;
     }
 
+    /* We bound with nl_pid=0, so the kernel assigned this socket a unique port
+     * id (it is not the process pid - a process may own several netlink
+     * sockets). getsockname() above is the only way to learn it: hand it back
+     * to the caller, which uses it to check that replies are addressed to this
+     * socket.
+     */
+    *local_pid = local.nl_pid;
+
     return 0;
 }
 
@@ -243,6 +251,7 @@
            void *arg_cb)
 {
     int fd, ret;
+    uint32_t local_pid = 0;
     struct sockaddr_nl nladdr;
     struct nlmsgerr *err;
     struct nlmsghdr *h;
@@ -264,11 +273,17 @@
     nladdr.nl_pid = peer;
     nladdr.nl_groups = groups;
 
-    /* NB: We currently do not verify seq and pid on answers.
-     * If we ever want to start with that we probably need to come up
-     * with something better than "seconds since epoch"...
+    /* Match replies to requests with a monotonically increasing sequence
+     * number, seeded once from wall-clock time so it differs between runs.
+     * The kernel echoes this seq (and our port id) in its replies, letting the
+     * receive loop below discard any unrelated or spoofed message.
      */
-    payload->nlmsg_seq = (uint32_t)time(NULL);
+    static uint32_t sitnl_seq;
+    if (!sitnl_seq)
+    {
+        sitnl_seq = (uint32_t)time(NULL);
+    }
+    uint32_t seq = payload->nlmsg_seq = ++sitnl_seq;
 
     /* no need to send reply */
     if (!cb)
@@ -283,7 +298,7 @@
         return -errno;
     }
 
-    if (sitnl_bind(fd, 0) < 0)
+    if (sitnl_bind(fd, 0, &local_pid) < 0)
     {
         msg(M_WARN | M_ERRNO, "%s: can't bind rtnl socket", __func__);
         ret = -errno;
@@ -357,18 +372,22 @@
                 goto out;
             }
 
-            /*            if (((int)nladdr.nl_pid != peer) || (h->nlmsg_pid != nladdr.nl_pid)
-             *               || (h->nlmsg_seq != seq))
-             *           {
-             *               rcv_len -= NLMSG_ALIGN(len);
-             *               h = (struct nlmsghdr *)((char *)h + NLMSG_ALIGN(len));
-             *               msg(M_DEBUG, "%s: skipping unrelated message. nl_pid:%d (peer:%d)
-             * nl_msg_pid:%d nl_seq:%d seq:%d",
-             *                   __func__, (int)nladdr.nl_pid, peer, h->nlmsg_pid,
-             *                   h->nlmsg_seq, seq);
-             *               continue;
-             *           }
+            /* Discard any message that did not come from the kernel or does
+             * not match the request we sent: only the kernel (nl_pid 0) can
+             * legitimately reply, and a valid reply echoes our port id and
+             * sequence number. This prevents a local process from injecting a
+             * spoofed reply that the callback would otherwise act on.
              */
+            if ((nladdr.nl_pid != 0) || (h->nlmsg_pid != local_pid)
+                || (h->nlmsg_seq != seq))
+            {
+                msg(D_RTNL,
+                    "%s: skipping unrelated message. nl_pid:%u nlmsg_pid:%u (local:%u) nlmsg_seq:%u (seq:%u)",
+                    __func__, nladdr.nl_pid, h->nlmsg_pid, local_pid, h->nlmsg_seq, seq);
+                rcv_len -= NLMSG_ALIGN(len);
+                h = (struct nlmsghdr *)((char *)h + NLMSG_ALIGN(len));
+                continue;
+            }
 
             if (h->nlmsg_type == NLMSG_DONE)
             {
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.