[Proftpd-user] Thoughts on using semver for future version labels?

TJ Saunders <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.proftpd.user
Message-ID <1492997012.1048860.953749464.14CA3B64@webmail.messagingengine.com>
I've been thinking/wondering whether it would make sense for ProFTPD to
use semver[1] semantics for its versioning.  Thus rather than:

  1.3.7rc1

we'd have:

  1.3.7-rc1

Or maybe we'd move away from the RC process, and instead start to
increase the patch number more frequently, incrementing that number
instead of using RC labels:

  1.3.7
  1.3.8
  1.4.0

And so the "stable" releases would start be more of incrementing the
minor or major versions.

Thoughts?
TJ

[1] http://semver.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
ProFTPD Users List   <[email protected]>
Unsubscribe problems?
http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.