[Proftpd-user] Thoughts on using semver for future version labels?
TJ Saunders <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.proftpd.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1492997012.1048860.953749464.14CA3B64@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
I've been thinking/wondering whether it would make sense for ProFTPD to use semver[1] semantics for its versioning. Thus rather than: 1.3.7rc1 we'd have: 1.3.7-rc1 Or maybe we'd move away from the RC process, and instead start to increase the patch number more frequently, incrementing that number instead of using RC labels: 1.3.7 1.3.8 1.4.0 And so the "stable" releases would start be more of incrementing the minor or major versions. Thoughts? TJ [1] http://semver.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ ProFTPD Users List <[email protected]> Unsubscribe problems? http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html