Re: [Proftpd-user] Thoughts on using semver for future version labels?

Hi,

On Sun, Apr 23, TJ Saunders wrote:

> I've been thinking/wondering whether it would make sense for ProFTPD to
> use semver[1] semantics for its versioning.  Thus rather than:
> 
>   1.3.7rc1
> 
> we'd have:
> 
>   1.3.7-rc1
> 
> Or maybe we'd move away from the RC process, and instead start to
> increase the patch number more frequently, incrementing that number
> instead of using RC labels:
> 
>   1.3.7
>   1.3.8
>   1.4.0
> 
> And so the "stable" releases would start be more of incrementing the
> minor or major versions.

I would like the stable version with an even number in the middle an the
unstable ones with an odd one.

Ex. for unstable versions
1.3.7
1.3.8 

2.1.0
2.1.1
2.1.2

Ex. for stable ones:

1.4.0
1.4.1
1.4.2

2.2.0
2.2.1


-- 
Regards

  Dieter

--
I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software.
If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your
address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the
>From field.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
ProFTPD Users List   <[email protected]>
Unsubscribe problems?
http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html