Re: [Proftpd-user] mod_sftp vs sshd performance
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.proftpd.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks TJ. I did try the 128 version w/o a major improvement. How difficult would it be to support that the missing cipher in proftpd for someone with moderate C ability? On May 9, 2019, at 4:13 PM, Sergei Gerasenko <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> On May 9, 2019, at 2:23 PM, TJ Saunders <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >>> Thanks for the scriptlet. I think aes128-cbc is working comparatively >>> well. Is arcfour not available for proftpd anymore? >> >> The arcfour128 and arcfour256 ciphers are available, but not enabled by default. You may need to explicitly enable them, via the SFTPCiphers directive: >> >> http://www.proftpd.org/docs/contrib/mod_sftp.html#SFTPCiphers <http://www.proftpd.org/docs/contrib/mod_sftp.html#SFTPCiphers> >> >> Cheers, >> TJ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ProFTPD Users List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Unsubscribe problems? >> http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html <http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html> > _______________________________________________ ProFTPD Users List <[email protected]> Unsubscribe problems? http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html